- #STANG F2100 UNIVERSAL TV REMOTE MANUAL HOW TO#
- #STANG F2100 UNIVERSAL TV REMOTE MANUAL MANUAL#
- #STANG F2100 UNIVERSAL TV REMOTE MANUAL SOFTWARE#
Be honest, and add up the cost of all those in-house tools. You mention a host of in-house tools that you (or someone else) developped to get things done right, ie the way EPlan (or other similar software) does it.Įveryone knows that those tools are costly to develop and maintain. Doing cad is only relatively small fraction of the time spent of project (just like programming). On small projects (25 pages or less) 1h/page seam to work just fine, less time per page on larger ones thanks to copy and paste and few little things we use. It's tedious to do by hand but who likes that? We have created small utility that reads project data from our purchasing database and generates BOM pages in AutoCAD files which is a snap. One can dramatically cut this time down using basic copy and paste, small tools like DDNUMB, blocks with references or embeded variables etc. This is long obsolete and I hope nobody is doing it one line at a time. Things that seamed slow in AutoCAD are numbering of wire lables etc. In fact when I was first introduced to ePlan, it only had products from handfull of European companies (I hope this has changed). Unfortunately this doesn't apply to everyone (us for example) where most projects are 60-100 pages and hardware is diffrent making constant upgrades of the parts library very time consuming.
On a large scale project automatic referencing wins hands down, just like using same hardware over and over. Integrated project is nice thing to have, specially when large. I find AutoCAD faster as well - at least right now, for me, for project size we usualy do and for variety of hardware we encounter on a day to day basis. But by the same token, spreadsheets were only supposed to be for accountants and we make pretty good use of those, too. Yeah, I know, autocad was meant for mechanical drawings, and us electrical guys are forcing it to do something it wasn't meant to do. Does it make sense for everyone to stop using autocad though? Probably not.
I took the course, and I can understand why they consider it good business to make everyone use a tool like EPlan. Of course, you can only get your feet wet in 4 days, it takes much longer than that to master it. They put on a 4 day 'crash course' on the basics of EPlan to try to get everyone up to speed. GM-employed engineers have to get the certification, too. If you're a machine tool supplier to GM, you are expected to have EPlan P8 and someone on staff that is qualified to use it. GM has established EPlan as the standard, internally and externally, for electrical drawings.
#STANG F2100 UNIVERSAL TV REMOTE MANUAL SOFTWARE#
I hope you will eventually take the time to give the software a real test drive. If you went to this training without any previous EPlan exposure, then of course you will feel lost and overwhelmed. This has nothing to do with basic EPlan training.
#STANG F2100 UNIVERSAL TV REMOTE MANUAL HOW TO#
My understanding is that GM only offered those trainings to experienced EPlan users cause they wanted to train people on how to use the GM setup. Then you mention taking some form of training with GM. After all, how much time did you spend customizing AutoCAD to the point where you have it today? Same goes for any other software. As with any software of this magnitude, there is of course a learning curve and a commissioning phase that requires time and commitment. You know the feeling if you've ever had to deal with fair sized projects. Then what about updates to usual reports such as BOM? Customer calls and says he wants to switch PLC supplier. Just try renumbering the pages and then make sure all the xrefs are good. If that's your case, then by all mean EPlan is not for you. How can you possibly think that you can be any faster with a software where EVERYTHING has to be done manually, as opposed to a software that automates a lot of menial tasks? As a concrete example, how much time do you spend on a project just updating component cross-references (such as coil/contact xref)? And I'm not talking 2 pages projects. When I see comments like yours, I can't help but getting goosebumps. In those years I've used the software, trained people to use it and developped custom solutions with the API.
Hi ElecPneuGuy, Not wishing to start a flame war, but I've been using EPlan for the past 6 years. Just click “Edit Text” or double click me to add your own content and. Click here to add your own text and edit me.
#STANG F2100 UNIVERSAL TV REMOTE MANUAL MANUAL#
This risk is eliminated as is the time consuming manual creation of symbols. Macros for EPLAN Electric P8 make project planning easier.
0 kommentar(er)
